MINA NADYReal Estate DevelopmentRiyadh Marriott hotel
MINA NADYReal Estate Development
EmailWhatsApp
Riyadh / Marriott hotel
Development toolsComparable & Benchmarking

Comparable & Benchmarking

Create a transparent market-evidence schedule, normalize each observation and reconcile an adopted benchmark with explicit judgement.

Local save not yet confirmed

Input guidance and saving

Enter comparable prices and areas on the same basis. Adjustments are additive. Effective reconciliation weight = entered weight × reliability / 5. Non-zero adjustments need a rationale.

First visits open with illustrative example inputs. Replace these with your own evidence before relying on the outputs.

Inputs are stored in this browser, not in an account. They will not follow you to another device and can be lost when browser data is cleared. Uploaded images use separate local storage.

Review the report preview after changing inputs. Reports with outstanding checks remain drafts.

1. Basis of analysis

Define the subject and the common basis before entering evidence.

Evidence first

2. Adjustment criteria

Positive adjustment means the comparable is inferior to the subject; negative means superior.

#CriterionPurpose
1Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
2Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
3Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
4Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
5Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
6Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
7Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
8Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
9Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.

3. Market evidence & adjustments

Retain the source, date, reliability and rationale so another reviewer can follow the conclusion.

Comparable A

Total adjustment+13.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 3,175 / m² land

Comparable B

Total adjustment+12.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 3,002 / m² land

Comparable C

Total adjustment+17.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 2,698 / m² land

4. Reconciliation schedule

Adjusted evidence is weighted using the entered relevance weight, moderated by the reliability score.

Report output
Report readiness: Ready to issue

All evidence, calculations and rationales are complete. Currency conversion is not performed; use one common selected currency and unit.

EvidenceSourceUnadjusted / m² landTotal adj.Adjusted / m² landEffective weight
Comparable A
Primary corridor		Registered transaction
Reliability 5/5		EGP 2,810+13.0%EGP 3,17548.2%
Comparable B
Adjacent district		Verified offer
Reliability 4/5		EGP 2,680+12.0%EGP 3,00233.7%
Comparable C
Secondary corridor		Broker evidence
Reliability 3/5		EGP 2,306+17.0%EGP 2,69818.1%
Total normalized weighting100.0%
Development Assistant SuiteDevelopment, valuation and decision tools

Comparable & Benchmarking Report

North Coast Land Benchmark

Land Market Evidence

Adopted benchmark: EGP 3,030 per m² land
3 comparablesEGPPrepared for decision review
Tool built by Mina Nady Farhan · BSc Architecture and Urban Planning · MBA · PMP® · CM · FMVA®Confidential
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Executive conclusion

Market Evidence Reconciliation

The adopted benchmark reflects the normalized and adjusted evidence entered, weighted for relevance and reliability.
Report readiness: Ready to issue

The evidence schedule is complete for decision review.

EGP 3,030per m² land
EGP 3,002adjusted rate
EGP 2,698
EGP 3,175

Conclusion

Adopted rateEGP 3,030 per m² land. The conclusion should be reviewed if evidence reliability, transaction terms or adjustment rationale changes.

Effective reconciliation weight equals the entered relevance weight moderated by reliability (reliability / 5), then normalized to 100%.

Methodology

  • Enter all observations in the selected common currency and comparison unit; this tool does not perform FX conversion.
  • Apply transparent market, location, physical and commercial adjustments.
  • Use a positive adjustment where the comparable is inferior to the subject.
  • Moderate each relevance weight by its 1–5 reliability score before reconciliation.

Comparable A

EGP 3,175 / m² land

Primary corridor
Registered transaction
Reliability 5/5

Comparable B

EGP 3,002 / m² land

Adjacent district
Verified offer
Reliability 4/5

Comparable C

EGP 2,698 / m² land

Secondary corridor
Broker evidence
Reliability 3/5

Tool built by Mina Nady Farhan · BSc Architecture and Urban Planning · MBA · PMP® · CM · FMVA®ConfidentialPage 2
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Evidence schedule

Adjusted Comparable Evidence

All evidence is shown on the same comparison basis. Total adjustment is the sum of the stated criterion adjustments.
EvidenceSource / dateConsiderationAreaBase / m² landTotal adj.Adjusted / m² landEffective weight
Comparable A
Primary corridor		Registered transaction
2026-04-15 / Reliability 5/5		EGP 118,000,00042,000EGP 2,810+13.0%EGP 3,17548.2%
Comparable B
Adjacent district		Verified offer
2026-06-01 / Reliability 4/5		EGP 134,000,00050,000EGP 2,680+12.0%EGP 3,00233.7%
Comparable C
Secondary corridor		Broker evidence
2026-07-12 / Reliability 3/5		EGP 83,000,00036,000EGP 2,306+17.0%EGP 2,69818.1%
Normalized effective reconciliation weight100.0%
Evidence hierarchyRegistered or completed transactions normally carry more weight than unverified offers or broker opinions, subject to relevance, date and comparability.
Tool built by Mina Nady Farhan · BSc Architecture and Urban Planning · MBA · PMP® · CM · FMVA®ConfidentialPage 3
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Adjustment audit

Comparable A & Comparable B

Each material adjustment should be supported by a concise rationale and source.

Comparable A - Total +13.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+3.0%Older evidence adjusted to valuation date
Location-2.0%Comparable has a stronger micro-location
Site area+2.0%Subject has stronger site utility
Planning / FAR+5.0%Subject has stronger planning potential
Frontage / coastline+0.0%No adjustment
Infrastructure+1.0%Subject has stronger infrastructure position
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+4.0%Comparable had less favorable terms
Total adjustment+13.0%EGP 3,175 / m² land

Comparable B - Total +12.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+1.0%Evidence date indicates slightly inferior market conditions
Location+4.0%Inferior micro-location
Site area+0.0%No adjustment
Planning / FAR+2.0%Subject has stronger planning potential
Frontage / coastline+3.0%Subject frontage is superior
Infrastructure+0.0%No adjustment
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+2.0%Comparable terms are less favorable
Total adjustment+12.0%EGP 3,002 / m² land
Tool built by Mina Nady Farhan · BSc Architecture and Urban Planning · MBA · PMP® · CM · FMVA®ConfidentialPage 4
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Adjustment audit & reconciliation

Comparable C, Range & Professional Checks

The final comparable audit is presented beside the reconciled evidence range and issue checks.

Comparable C - Total +17.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+0.0%No adjustment
Location+7.0%Secondary location requires upward adjustment
Site area-1.0%Comparable has superior site area characteristics
Planning / FAR+4.0%Lower permitted density
Frontage / coastline+2.0%Subject has stronger frontage
Infrastructure+2.0%Subject has stronger infrastructure position
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+3.0%Comparable terms are less favorable
Total adjustment+17.0%EGP 2,698 / m² land

Adjusted evidence range

3,175
3,002
2,698

Issue checks

Common currency and unitConfirmed
Evidence source and date recordedConfirmed
Adjustment rationale completeConfirmed
Weights normalized100.0%
Report readinessReady to issue
Standards basisThe schedule supports a comparable-method workflow. Formal valuation compliance, investigations and professional judgement remain engagement-specific responsibilities.
Tool built by Mina Nady Farhan · BSc Architecture and Urban Planning · MBA · PMP® · CM · FMVA®ConfidentialPage 5